| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 5/4] xfs: fix nfs export of 64-bit inodes numbers on 32-bit kernels |
| From: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Dec 2011 10:07:12 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20111130085817.GA22471@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20111128081732.350228200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111130085817.GA22471@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hey Christoph,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 03:58:18AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The i_ino field in the VFS inode is of type unsigned long and thus can't
> hold the full 64-bit inode number on 32-bit kernels. We have the full
> inode number in the XFS inode, so use that one for nfs exports. Note
> that I've also switched the 32-bit file handles types to it, just to make
> the code more consistent and copy & paste errors less likely to happen.
>
> Reported-by: Guoquan Yang <ygq51@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Hank Peng <pengxihan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
To what extent did you test this one? Anything in particular I should
look for when I test it?
Thanks,
Ben
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: fix the logspace waiting algorithm, Chandra Seetharaman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, for-linus, updated. v3.2-rc1-8-g4c393a6, xfs |
| Previous by Thread: | YOUR EMAIL ID HAS WON 500,000 POUNDS IN THE 2011 COCA-COLA PROMOTION!!!, cokeplcuk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 5/4] xfs: fix nfs export of 64-bit inodes numbers on 32-bit kernels, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |