xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable (again)

To: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable (again)
From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 15:33:02 -0800
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=JNmR0k5zkgY/gqW8u3v3K5pzDN0=; b=cdrxQmYTclkaPnlxLMNcpzBpOwOb Hu7a+YKZ8sVcIBB0o/H2XSSuGkK4gRjr/jhut+DBuRQXSI71PNH5kFmMzryrawrE cfRFqfJlHeIwaB9KTG6enVry8sGcWxxDqPJBnYNZZkMNCfunoHLzk2nzEI59yQZE J/ZC33sKSeysJFs=
In-reply-to: <1322782064-1723-1-git-send-email-bpm@xxxxxxx>
References: <1322782064-1723-1-git-send-email-bpm@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:27:38PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> This is a series of XFS fixes from current mainline which is important for
> 3.1-stable.  Note that it is the same patch set that Christoph submitted for
> 3.0-stable, minus the first three patches which are already included in 3.1.
> 
> My QA came out ok with these six patches atop 3.1.y.  I've been having trouble
> getting mail out to stable@vger, but it seems to be working now.  Apologies to
> those who are getting this mail yet again.

Nice, I got all of these, thanks.  I'll queue them up in a few days when
I get caught up on the stable patch queue.

greg k-h

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>