| To: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: fix attr2 vs large data fork assert |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:03:00 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20111128180136.GS29840@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20111128081732.350228200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111128081925.458494771@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111128180136.GS29840@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:01:36PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > This is missing some cleanups that you did for v2. I'll use that > version, unless you have an objection. Looks like I got lost in my maze of trees. Pick whichever you want. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: fix attr2 vs large data fork assert, Ben Myers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS read hangs in 3.1-rc10, Simon Kirby |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: fix attr2 vs large data fork assert, Ben Myers |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 3/4] xfs: force buffer writeback before blocking on the ilock in inode reclaim, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |