xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable

To: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable
From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:54:18 -0600
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20111128134829.GC21041@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <1322084293-23557-1-git-send-email-bpm@xxxxxxx> <20111128110043.GA13766@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111128134829.GC21041@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Hey Greg,

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:48:29PM +0900, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 06:00:43AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 03:38:07PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> > > This is a series of XFS fixes from current mainline which is important for
> > > 3.1-stable.  Note that it is the same patch set that Christoph submitted 
> > > for
> > > 3.0-stable, minus the first three patches which are already included in 
> > > 3.1.
> > > 
> > > My QA came out ok with these six patches atop 3.1.y.  Apologies to those 
> > > who
> > > got this mail twice. 
> > 
> > The updates looks good to me.
> 
> I never saw this series once, can someone please resend them as I don't
> see them anywhere.

The first time I sent this 3.1.y series you were not on the --to=, which
is why some people got the series twice but you didn't.  Sorry for the
confusion. 

Do you need the series for 3.0 to be resubmitted?

Thanks,
        Ben

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>