| To: | Richard Scobie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair is recommended over xfs_check. |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:23:06 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4ECAC84C.1070000@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4ECAC84C.1070000@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:53:16AM +1300, Richard Scobie wrote: > Is there currently now any situation where xfs_check would be used > in preference to xfs_repair? > > If not, perhaps xfs_check could be deprecated. xfs_check is one of the ways we test that xfs_repair is doing the right thing. Having two implementation that you can use to compare results is a good thing..... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: EFSCORRUPTED on mount?, Gregory Farnum |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Get your Guaranteed $8,736 Commissions Direct Paypal!!!, support |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair is recommended over xfs_check., Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair is recommended over xfs_check., Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |