| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair is recommended over xfs_check. |
| From: | Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz <arekm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:37:52 +0100 |
| Cc: | Richard Scobie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=maven.pl; s=maven; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=gRRARIBfSJwtbqYeSwgd1CuUYNn95FdaCQn5/JGr9Dk=; b=N+dBE/VGj0UQNGD1wqMdn/geI6fhDEW6U0R7GcXYfkpgqIikBSTLZLHnswdBvDTg6R Wv4cG6So2DEjNytN7U5FuuZD8xrL/YUBHQZbEsB5m/Af5hnKpkEROnoi66nufTEO0xTt jAdfFXkT9YIhVfvdqLiV8CC+qwWG6xtA72oGg= |
| In-reply-to: | <4ECAC84C.1070000@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4ECAC84C.1070000@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-rc2-00132-gc5e0c78; KDE/4.7.3; x86_64; ; ) |
On Monday 21 of November 2011, Richard Scobie wrote: > Is there currently now any situation where xfs_check would be used in > preference to xfs_repair? > > If not, perhaps xfs_check could be deprecated. There was a such idea but: 21:25 < sandeen_> well, it has a lot of use in xfstests, so it's nice to have built & around, I think. -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: EFSCORRUPTED on mount?, Ben Myers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: Remove the entries from the queue while waking them up., Chandra Seetharaman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair is recommended over xfs_check., Richard Scobie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair is recommended over xfs_check., Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |