[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair is recommended over xfs_check.

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair is recommended over xfs_check.
From: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz <arekm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:37:52 +0100
Cc: Richard Scobie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=maven.pl; s=maven; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=gRRARIBfSJwtbqYeSwgd1CuUYNn95FdaCQn5/JGr9Dk=; b=N+dBE/VGj0UQNGD1wqMdn/geI6fhDEW6U0R7GcXYfkpgqIikBSTLZLHnswdBvDTg6R Wv4cG6So2DEjNytN7U5FuuZD8xrL/YUBHQZbEsB5m/Af5hnKpkEROnoi66nufTEO0xTt jAdfFXkT9YIhVfvdqLiV8CC+qwWG6xtA72oGg=
In-reply-to: <4ECAC84C.1070000@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4ECAC84C.1070000@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-rc2-00132-gc5e0c78; KDE/4.7.3; x86_64; ; )
On Monday 21 of November 2011, Richard Scobie wrote:
> Is there currently now any situation where xfs_check would be used in
> preference to xfs_repair?
> If not, perhaps xfs_check could be deprecated.

There was a such idea but:

21:25 < sandeen_> well, it has a lot of use in xfstests, so it's nice to have 
built & around, I think.

Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>