On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:00:50PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On 15 November 2011 08:48, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > This new version basically replaced the build-depends on
> > libreadline-gplv2-dev
> > by a build-depends on
> > libreadline5-dev | libreadline-gplv2-dev
> >
> > Given libreadline5-dev is not in the archive, the package can't be
> > built,
>
>
> It seems to work as expected for me (iow, if either of the two are
> installed, it proceeds with using the installed package). I tested both
> variants on latest unstable, so I'm at a loss to explain the failure you're
> seeing - can you forward the build output showing the issue?
The buildd daemons require that the first package of an alternative
exists in the archive, which is not the case there. You'll find
attached a build log showing the issue.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.aurel32.net
xfsprogs_3.1.6-s390-20111115-0227
Description: Text document
|