| To: | Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:04:46 -0500 |
| Cc: | dave@xxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, aelder@xxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <87sjm0kqjk.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1320342953-7973-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> <1320342953-7973-6-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> <20111107132533.GP12759@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87sjm0kqjk.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 05:31:11PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > Have you recompile fsstress via make? > test explicitly want use new feature "-f setattr=1" Btw, one useful thing for these patches would be to clearly error out if fsstress does't recognize the option. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, David Sterba |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [BUG] assert in xfs_imap_to_bp, line 185, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, David Sterba |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 7/9] xfstests: add a new quota test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, Dmitry Monakhov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |