On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 05:20:12AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Index: xfsprogs/repair/scan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfsprogs.orig/repair/scan.c 2011-10-30 05:56:36.168127218 +0100
> +++ xfsprogs/repair/scan.c 2011-10-30 05:57:45.981169953 +0100
> @@ -289,14 +289,14 @@ _("bad back (left) sibling pointer (saw
> */
> set_bmap(agno, agbno, XR_E_MULT);
> do_warn(
> -_("inode 0x%" PRIu64 "bmap block 0x%" PRIu64 " claimed, state is %d\n"),
> +_("inode 0x%" PRIu64 "bmap block 0x%" PRIx64 " claimed, state is %d\n"),
> ino, bno, state);
> break;
> case XR_E_MULT:
> case XR_E_INUSE_FS:
> set_bmap(agno, agbno, XR_E_MULT);
> do_warn(
> -_("inode 0x%" PRIu64 " bmap block 0x%" PRIu64 " claimed, state is %d\n"),
> +_("inode 0x%" PRIu64 " bmap block 0x%" PRIx64 " claimed, state is %d\n"),
> ino, bno, state);
> /*
> * if we made it to here, this is probably a bmap block
These two entries still need fix in the first format strings of both
msgids...
I'm attaching my version of the whole patch.
--
Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/
xfsprogs-msgids.patch
Description: Text document
|