xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 6/8] xfstests: add fiemap operation to fsstress

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] xfstests: add fiemap operation to fsstress
From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:14:04 +0400
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, aelder@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=xq2Yg448mAbPizMIRYN/PFBB4aUdQ5NeOoKJ8XQM8iM=; b=W/LkGnKALevoCkv6YbORKc5HCtujukYSp/AruoRsNWm94ZXLjHgNHUuLXWFpzDMc58 Yj49nzPRFfXrKXrAFALxwMdylKapnf0hIw3nY84uQjXu59KnAhNyXdgFVLt60SvCJY7E u+qqo4RYIGOwUWx+m7fY9757vl5gR70iAQFO4=
In-reply-to: <87zkgdy2fi.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1319849297-3506-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> <1319849297-3506-7-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> <20111102195534.GB22500@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87zkgdy2fi.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: Dmitry Monakhov <rjevskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Notmuch/0.5-69-g3e4a9d6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu)
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:34:41 +0400, Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:55:34 -0400, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 04:48:15AM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> > > Related bug: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/118863
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This causes a very weird XFS failure in test 117 for me.  While it
> > obviously is an xfs bug that you uncovered (good!) I'm a bit worried
> > about simply enabling operations in existing tests.
> Ohh. i've got what your are talking about. We can not add new ops
> for tests there seed is passed explicitly. And yes i've braked this, but
> this is because such frozen tests was written in not determined
> way :). Good determined test should has not just seed opt, but also
> explicit set of operations. All others (non determined) tests which use
> fsstress may benefit from new ops. So I'll redo my patch queue like this:
> 1) Add explicit option set for all frozen tests
i've stuck immediately on first test ;(.
on my kernel 107'th test always failed (commit: 73a57c642cdfa660
"1.1.0 release"), is it expected? Which xfs-tree and commit should i use?
> 2) Add new features to fssstress with non zero probability. 
> > 
> > Alex, Eric, Dave - should we add new tests with the new operations
> > Dmitry added, or is adding new ops to the existing tests fine?
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>