xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfstests 264: add a copy and reserve test

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfstests 264: add a copy and reserve test
From: WuBo <wu.bo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:04:43 +0800
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20111103065525.GA6800@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4EB20505.7070005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4EB205C7.6010906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111103065525.GA6800@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100921 Fedora/3.1.4-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.4
On 11/03/2011 02:55 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:08:55AM +0800, WuBo wrote:
>> This test is a stress test. It creates a set of threads for coping small 
>> files 
>> into disk. I use a 2G disk for test, the ENOSPC arises usually but the disk 
>> is 
>> not full under kenerl 3.0 with intel64.
> 
> It seems like you really want to use _scratch_mkfs_sized instead of the
> btrfs-specific resize option and make the test generic.  Also we already
OK, thanks for _scratch_mkfs_sized, It's will make these tests generic.

> have used up these test numbers in the xfstests-dev repository, and I
> will commit another batch of tests today.
I will change my test numbers in next version.

thanks,
wubo

> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>