xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfstests 264: add a copy and reserve test

To: WuBo <wu.bo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfstests 264: add a copy and reserve test
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 02:55:25 -0400
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4EB205C7.6010906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4EB20505.7070005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4EB205C7.6010906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:08:55AM +0800, WuBo wrote:
> This test is a stress test. It creates a set of threads for coping small 
> files 
> into disk. I use a 2G disk for test, the ENOSPC arises usually but the disk 
> is 
> not full under kenerl 3.0 with intel64.

It seems like you really want to use _scratch_mkfs_sized instead of the
btrfs-specific resize option and make the test generic.  Also we already
have used up these test numbers in the xfstests-dev repository, and I
will commit another batch of tests today.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>