| To: | Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 6/8] xfstests: add fiemap operation to fsstress |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:55:34 -0400 |
| Cc: | linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, aelder@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1319849297-3506-7-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1319849297-3506-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> <1319849297-3506-7-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 04:48:15AM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > Related bug: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/118863 > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> This causes a very weird XFS failure in test 117 for me. While it obviously is an xfs bug that you uncovered (good!) I'm a bit worried about simply enabling operations in existing tests. Alex, Eric, Dave - should we add new tests with the new operations Dmitry added, or is adding new ops to the existing tests fine? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 7/8] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Fix possible memory corruption in xfs_readlink, Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 7/8] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 6/8] xfstests: add fiemap operation to fsstress, Dmitry Monakhov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |