xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfstests: split mapped writes vs direct I/O tests from 0

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfstests: split mapped writes vs direct I/O tests from 091
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 03:32:32 -0400
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20111011224010.GG3159@dastard>
References: <20111010182156.GA1323@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111010182216.GA1335@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111011224010.GG3159@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:40:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > +# creator
> > +owner=nathans@xxxxxxx
> 
> No point keeping an invalid email address as the owner of a new
> test.
> 
> FWIW, I'm considering removing this from the tests as the
> information is in the commit history, and the use of the field
> (emailing the owner when the automated test infrastructure SGI used
> 10 years ago failed) is no longer used...

We should really just kill it.  If anyone runs the test automated again
he should get the mails and/or cc the xfs lists.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>