xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 7/9] xfs: clean up xfs_ioerror_alert

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] xfs: clean up xfs_ioerror_alert
From: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:37:16 -0500
Cc: <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20111006210639.731475087@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20111006210607.175284390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111006210639.731475087@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: <aelder@xxxxxxx>
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 17:06 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Instead of passing the block number and mount structure explicitly
> get them off the bp and fix make the argument order more natural.
> 
> Also move it to xfs_buf.c and stop printing the device name given
> that we already get the fs name as part of xfs_alert, and we know
> what device is operates on because of the caller that gets printed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

I agree on the name change suggestion, possibly to
xfs_buf_error_alert().  Also, with just one exception
it seems that the "func" argument is simply the name
of the calling function.  I would favor adding that
via passing __func__ in a macro.  If distinguishing
between the cases in xlog_sync(), xfs_trans_read_buf(),
and xfs_zero_remaining_bytes() were important then
the line number could be included.

Anyway, looks good.

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>