On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 11:00 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is no reason to keep a reference to the inode even if we unlock
> it during transaction commit because we never drop a reference between
> the ijoin and commit. Also use this fact to merge xfs_trans_ijoin_ref
> back into xfs_trans_ijoin - the third argument decides if an unlock
> is needed now.
> I'm actually starting to wonder if allowing inodes to be unlocked
> at transaction commit really is worth the effort. The only real
> benefit is that they can be unlocked earlier when commiting a
> synchronous transactions, but that could be solved by doing the
> log force manually after the unlock, too.
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>