| To: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] libxfs: handle read errors in libxfs_trans_read_buf |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:49:36 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1316630707.5872.13.camel@doink> |
| References: | <20110920215917.508421839@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110920220030.204339904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1316630707.5872.13.camel@doink> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:45:07PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > Probably wouldn't hurt to initialize b_fsprivate2 even > if the transaction pointer is null. Looks good though. It would - given that another transaction could be set in there. Fairly unlikely in userspace, but quite possible in the kernel. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH v2] xfsdump: call mlog_exit in content_stream_restore, Bill Kendall |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfsdump: call mlog_exit in content_stream_restore, Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] libxfs: handle read errors in libxfs_trans_read_buf, Alex Elder |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] libxfs: handle read errors in libxfs_trans_read_buf, Alex Elder |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |