[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The xfsprogs debian package

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: The xfsprogs debian package
From: Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:21:45 -0500
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAAp5ZgML+9Pnni0eTCXvXN1uo8Hs7Ksrvfooto9aYr9Ctt2Hbw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20110919170936.GA27014@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110919171047.GA3092@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110920105808.GA20601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAAp5ZgML+9Pnni0eTCXvXN1uo8Hs7Ksrvfooto9aYr9Ctt2Hbw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 08:48:19AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
>Having said all that, I really don't have a strong opinion - what
>xfsprogs really needs is someone with the time to take ownership, and
>I've not found the time recently.  If someone would own it well, and
>for them its easier to not have a native package (which it likely will
>be)... please go ahead and manage the package however best suits.

I'll manage it without changing its current Debian ownership. I'll keep
the list as the Debian package owner and Nathan and myself as uploaders
to the Debian package.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>