| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: Check the return value of xfs_trans_get_buf() |
| From: | Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:05:54 -0500 |
| Cc: | XFS Mailing List <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20110920150029.GA5239@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | IBM |
| References: | <1316527015.9298.60.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110920150029.GA5239@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 11:00 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 08:56:55AM -0500, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c > > @@ -2948,6 +2948,8 @@ xfs_attr_leaf_freextent(xfs_trans_t **trans, > > xfs_inode_t *dp, > > bp = xfs_trans_get_buf(*trans, > > dp->i_mount->m_ddev_targp, > > dblkno, dblkcnt, XBF_LOCK); > > + if (!bp) > > + return ENOMEM; > > xfs_trans_binval(*trans, bp); > > xfs_trans_binval only really does anything if the buffer was in memory. > > We have a few callers using that patterm, and I think they should simply > switch to not reading the buffer in if it's not there yet, e.g. > using something like an xfs_trans_incore. Hi Christoph, I do not understand. Can you elaborate on what needs to be done. Thanks Chandra > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs deadlock in stable kernel 3.0.4, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: Check the return value of xfs_trans_get_buf(), Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: Check the return value of xfs_trans_get_buf(), Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: Check the return value of xfs_trans_get_buf(), Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |