| To: | Joshua Aune <luken@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Performance regression between 2.6.32 and 2.6.38 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Sep 2011 02:05:23 -0400 |
| Cc: | "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Saab <ps@xxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <F70D1B6A-0387-4646-B97B-98ED895F7759@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <F70D1B6A-0387-4646-B97B-98ED895F7759@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 06:23:54PM -0600, Joshua Aune wrote: > Are there any mount options or other tests that can be run in the failing > configuration that would be helpful to isolate this further? The best thing would be to bisect it down to at least a kernel release, and if possible to a -rc or individual change (the latter might start to get hard due to various instabilities in early -rc kernels) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Performance regression between 2.6.32 and 2.6.38, Joshua Aune |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | xfs deadlock in stable kernel 3.0.4, Stefan Priebe |
| Previous by Thread: | Performance regression between 2.6.32 and 2.6.38, Joshua Aune |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Performance regression between 2.6.32 and 2.6.38, Paul Saab |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |