| To: | Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: fix possible overflow in xfs_ioc_trim() |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:33:01 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1315322977-22736-1-git-send-email-lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1315322977-22736-1-git-send-email-lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:29:37PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> In xfs_ioc_trim it is possible that start+len might overflow. Fix it by
> decrementing the len so that start+len equals to the file system size in
> the worst case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ xfs_ioc_trim(
> unsigned int granularity = q->limits.discard_granularity;
> struct fstrim_range range;
> xfs_fsblock_t start, len, minlen;
> + xfs_fsblock_t max_blks = mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks;
> xfs_agnumber_t start_agno, end_agno, agno;
> __uint64_t blocks_trimmed = 0;
> int error, last_error = 0;
> @@ -171,7 +172,8 @@ xfs_ioc_trim(
> start_agno = XFS_FSB_TO_AGNO(mp, start);
> if (start_agno >= mp->m_sb.sb_agcount)
> return -XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
> -
> + if (len > max_blks)
> + len = max_blks - start;
Is this really the correct check?
Shouldn't it be
if (start + len > max_blks)
len = max_blks - start;
I'd also just use the mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks value directly instead
of assigning it to a local variable.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH v2] xfs: fix possible overflow in xfs_ioc_trim(), Lukas Czerner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS frozen when moving file from one project quota to another, Boris . SANEGRE |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH v2] xfs: fix possible overflow in xfs_ioc_trim(), Lukas Czerner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: fix possible overflow in xfs_ioc_trim(), Lukas Czerner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |