| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 04/25] xfs: factor extent map manipulations out of xfs_bmapi |
| From: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:23:11 -0500 |
| Cc: | <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20110824060641.102703569@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20110824060428.789245205@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110824060641.102703569@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 02:04 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Unfortunately the content of the new xfs_bmapi_update_map()
is as hideous as it was before, but at least it's isolated.
The -1 index values are just awful, even if we do know from
the logic that they're indexing non-negative offsets into the
underlying array. I do think it's good that you encapsulated
this without changing the existing logic, but someday maybe
this function can be improved.
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
You included no signoff. I am going to assume it included
this like the rest of the series:
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 03/25] xfs: remove the nextents variable in xfs_bmapi, Alex Elder |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 05/25] xfs: introduce xfs_bmapi_read(), Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 03/25] xfs: remove the nextents variable in xfs_bmapi, Alex Elder |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 04/25] xfs: factor extent map manipulations out of xfs_bmapi, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |