| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfsprogs: xfs_quota: a few fixes |
| From: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:19:49 -0500 |
| Cc: | <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20110825045823.GA23901@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1314222823-24101-1-git-send-email-aelder@xxxxxxx> <20110825045823.GA23901@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 00:58 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:53:40PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> > The main problem solved in this series is that for project
> > quotas, the numbers of blocks reported by the xfs_quota "df"
> > subcommand is twice what it should be. While looking at
> > this I also noticed two other problems that I corrected.
> >
> > Below is a script that demonstrates the problem.
>
> This script should be turned into an xfsqa testcase.
>
I knew someone would say that (but was hoping
I would not hear it)...
I will do it.
-Alex
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: use fs netlink interface for ENOSPC conditions, Lukas Czerner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: deprecate the nodelaylog mount option, Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfsprogs: xfs_quota: a few fixes, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | preparing a new xfsprogs release?, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |