xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce filesystem writeback from page reclaim v2

To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce filesystem writeback from page reclaim v2
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:50:05 +0900
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Weiner <jweiner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=e1Q+YILLCvj3yhCIfYyD+etUzvbA8XxEdtHxWGV1qUc=; b=WpUjdliclIhDarDEClPcMWqf2EydA7yUfK/Jn84YL3lt7Ziq8sElwcndsStgd8zArG 5quDABAVUWtZixii2udjPxJ1EJ1H32zVzN1RKPout5jn5lfdFQtbTdkqMn0dhAnvipgt 0aFKgounePrA5iNw0y/Uf/BHYMII3iirPaWEM=
In-reply-to: <20110729094816.GG1843@barrios-desktop>
References: <1311265730-5324-1-git-send-email-mgorman@xxxxxxx> <20110727161821.GA1738@barrios-desktop> <20110728113852.GN3010@xxxxxxx> <20110729094816.GG1843@barrios-desktop>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sorry for missing Ccing.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 06:48:16PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:38:52PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 01:18:21AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:28:42PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > Note how preventing kswapd reclaiming dirty pages pushes up its CPU
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > > > usage as it scans more pages but it does not get excessive due to
> > > > the throttling.
> > > 
> > > Good to hear.
> > > The concern of this patchset was early OOM kill with too many scanning.
> > > I can throw such concern out from now on.
> > > 
> > 
> > At least, I haven't been able to trigger a premature OOM.
> 
> AFAIR, Andrew had a premature OOM problem[1] but I couldn't track down at 
> that time.
> I think this patch series might solve his problem. Although it doesn't, it 
> should not accelerate
> his problem, at least.
> 
> Andrew, Could you test this patchset?
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/25/415
> -- 
> Kind regards,
> Minchan Kim

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>