xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfstests: Add support for btrfs in 015

To: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfstests: Add support for btrfs in 015
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:47:56 -0400
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <bebfc5c98e0fb878f55c1312d8750ce7b7f82e07.1311776403.git.sbehrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <cover.1311776403.git.sbehrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <bebfc5c98e0fb878f55c1312d8750ce7b7f82e07.1311776403.git.sbehrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:28:00AM +0200, Stefan Behrens wrote:
> Added btrfs to the list of supported filesystems for test 015, and
> increased free space reporting tolerance to 10% for btrfs.
> Replaced the call to _scratch_mkfs_xfs with the XFS specific size
> parameter by the generic one for sized filesystem creation which is
> _scratch_mkfs_sized.

ACK for the _scratch_mkfs_sized changed, but I'm really curious why
we would allow so much more tolerance for btrfs.

And again, why can't these be marked generic?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>