On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:57:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 17:28 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Assuming that flusher threads will always write back dirty pages promptly
> > then it is always faster for reclaimers to wait for flushers. This patch
> > prevents kswapd writing back any filesystem pages.
> That is a somewhat sort changelog for such a big assumption ;-)
That is an understatement but the impact of the patch is discussed in
detail in the leader. On NUMA, this patch has a negative impact so
I put no effort into the changelog. The patch is part of the series
because it was specifically asked for.
> I think it can use a few extra words to explain the need to clean pages
> from @zone vs writeback picks whatever fits best on disk and how that
> works out wrt the assumption.
At the time of writing the changelog, I knew that flushers were
not finding pages from the correct zones quickly enough in the NUMA
usecase. The changelog documents the assumptions testing shows them to
> What requirements does this place on writeback and how does it meet
It places a requirement on writeback to prioritise pages from zones
under memory pressure. It doesn't meet them. I mention in the leader
that I think patch 8 should be dropped which is why the changelog