On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 13:10 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 01:14:09PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> > Pull into a helper function some debug-only code that validates a
> > xfs_da_blkinfo structure that's been read from disk.
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > Index: b/fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c
> > @@ -692,6 +692,24 @@ xfs_da_join(xfs_da_state_t *state)
> > return(error);
> > }
> > +#ifdef DEBUG
> > +static void
> > +xfs_da_blkinfo_validate(struct xfs_da_blkinfo *blkinfo, __u16 level)
> I'm not sure the name is a good one. E.g. the forw/backw pointers
> really rely on this node not having any siblings. Which they shoudn't
> have here, but that's not generally true of any blkinfo.
> Otherwise looks fine.
What about xfs_da_blkinfo_onlychild_validate()?
It's pushing the limits of acceptable name length
as far as I'm concerned though. Let me know if
this is good enough, or if you have another idea.