[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 02/12] xfs: Remove the macro XFS_BUF_ZEROFLAGS

To: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] xfs: Remove the macro XFS_BUF_ZEROFLAGS
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:59:01 -0400
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20110716012116.6629.48217.sendpatchset@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20110716012105.6629.24407.sendpatchset@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110716012116.6629.48217.sendpatchset@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> @@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ xlog_sync(xlog_t                *log,
>       }
>       XFS_BUF_SET_COUNT(bp, count);
>       XFS_BUF_SET_FSPRIVATE(bp, iclog);       /* save for later */
> -     XFS_BUF_ZEROFLAGS(bp);
>       XFS_BUF_BUSY(bp);
>       XFS_BUF_ASYNC(bp);
>       bp->b_flags |= XBF_LOG_BUFFER;

Note that XBF_ORDERED is gone in the current tree, you need to rebase
your patches to pick up the buffer changes I recently sent out.

I don't link this blind expansion.  For one all that flag setting is
duplicated in two places in xlog_sync, please send a patch to
consolidate it in xlog_bdstrat.  Second XBF_READ and XBF_DELWRI
won't ever be set here, so no need to clear them.  And XBF_WRITE
and XBF_ASYNC will get re-set a few lines down the code, so no need
to clear them either.  The XBF_FLUSH and XBF_FUA flag also get set
conditionally a little below, so I'd just clear them in an else
clause for the if condition checking if they should be set.

> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> index 04142ca..75ba081 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ xlog_bwrite(
>       ASSERT(BBTOB(nbblks) <= XFS_BUF_SIZE(bp));
>       XFS_BUF_SET_ADDR(bp, log->l_logBBstart + blk_no);
> -     XFS_BUF_ZEROFLAGS(bp);
>       XFS_BUF_BUSY(bp);
>       XFS_BUF_HOLD(bp);
>       XFS_BUF_PSEMA(bp, PRIBIO);

XBF_READ, XBF_WRITE, XBF_ASYNC and XBF_DELWRI already get dealt with
in xfs_bwrite a few lines down, and XBF_ORDERED can't be set here. IOW
this line can simply be removed.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>