| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Number of ACLs |
| From: | Laurent CARON <lcaron@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 07 Jul 2011 18:20:08 +0200 |
| Cc: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20110707152616.0e03b866@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4E15AA1A.3090802@xxxxxxxxx> <20110707152616.0e03b866@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0a1) Gecko/20110704 Thunderbird/7.0a1 |
On 07/07/2011 15:26, Emmanuel Florac wrote: Le Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:44:10 +0200 Laurent CARON<lcaron@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait:I'd like to know if it is possible in a simple& safe way to increase the number of supported ACLs on an already existing FS.I just realised I missed that part : there is absolutely no way to change an existing filesystem after the fact. My previous answer was about the fact that by installing a modified kernel module, there is a slight possibility that you can create a NEW filesystem with more ACLs (and beware, this is untested, unsupported, uncharted territory, "there be dragons" and al). Given that the modified xfs module actually works, given that the mkfs.xfs and other tools behave as expected (unlikely), and that the whole setup won't fall down in flames the first time you actually create 26 ACLs on a file, etc. Thanks.I'll cope with this limit for now and eventually will move to some other FS in the future if I still need to use more than 25 ACLs. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Recovering XFS Partition of Type FAT16, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 23/28] xfs: byteswap constants instead of variables, Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Number of ACLs, Emmanuel Florac |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Number of ACLs, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |