| To: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 15/27] xfs: cleanup the defintion of struct xfs_dir2_sf_entry |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Jul 2011 04:34:27 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1309923211.3381.27.camel@doink> |
| References: | <20110701094321.936534538@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110701094605.415405585@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1309923211.3381.27.camel@doink> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:33:31PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 05:43 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Remove the inumber member which is at a variable offset after the actual > > name, and make name a real variable sized C99 array instead of the incorrect > > one-sized array which confuses (not only) gcc. Based on this clean up > > the helpers to calculate the entry size. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Why was the inode put after then name in the > first place? I've wondered that, too. But it's been long before my time. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 14/27] xfs: kill struct xfs_dir2_sf, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 16/27] xfs: avoid usage of struct xfs_dir2_block, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 15/27] xfs: cleanup the defintion of struct xfs_dir2_sf_entry, Alex Elder |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 17/27] xfs: kill struct xfs_dir2_block, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |