[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstests 255: add a seek_data/seek_hole tester

To: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests 255: add a seek_data/seek_hole tester
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:36:48 -0400
Cc: P?draig Brady <P@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4E0B60DE.50908@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1309275199-10801-1-git-send-email-josef@xxxxxxxxxx> <1309275199-10801-5-git-send-email-josef@xxxxxxxxxx> <20110629065306.GC1026@dastard> <20110629074021.GA26086@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E0B019E.8080800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E0B60DE.50908@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:29:02AM -0700, Sunil Mushran wrote:
> I'm not too sure about that. Atleast not enabled by default. Most users
> use cp to backup data. Not empty space. In this case, this empty extent
> may not even be de-dupable.
> Frankly I'd be happier of cp started to exploited fallocate() to create larger
> extents before copying data into them. Atleast for the large files.

That's what delayed allocation is for.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>