| To: | david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 03/12] vmscan: reduce wind up shrinker->nr when shrinker can't do work |
| From: | KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:27:44 +0900 |
| Cc: | linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110621050914.GO32466@dastard> |
| References: | <1306998067-27659-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1306998067-27659-4-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DFE997C.2060805@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110621050914.GO32466@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
>> I mean, currently some mm folks plan to enhance shrinker. So, >> sharing benchmark may help to avoid an accidental regression. > > I predict that I will have some bug reporting to do in future. ;) Ok, I have no objection. thanks. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 03/12] vmscan: reduce wind up shrinker->nr when shrinker can't do work, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: improve sync behaviour in face of aggressive dirtying, Michael Monnerie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 03/12] vmscan: reduce wind up shrinker->nr when shrinker can't do work, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 04/12] vmscan: add customisable shrinker batch size, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |