| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfstest run result on 2.6.35.13 X86, 51 test cases failed |
| From: | Ajeet Yadav <ajeet.yadav.77@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:08:59 +0530 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=tX+M+l4XjCOSu01yBsLCgcS/1X7mDwFuNdxA0JXxFeQ=; b=LV/o9oJ8he35xLQVtZaqxclNhZ3osyM7FA7MR/ZgpiO94zebH4Hu2VHfkKygHaVO2M 4tYMFJV7plvyTz8dnWlbw2Fxdj0pEr+gnG5rfTxUxKYzjZ+pRG5s1y1lUp/fxLMAmVcZ Lh293AH+z0lnBSjuIL26pyAz+uyDkESAWVbdI= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=PEgzRQTAS7vE2ihKv2HgXmmgSt8zYSxNavNxjAf4kWAW9xdsWh2CPIRsoXWxuGNvic vvUjaE/wkJvtUIcp+PqXzRKHAQfCDLvL50dLI3SAgnA+zggDFieED7C/Ia1wizNaiwqa abx6qA52/4J2jpWFi0Haby3KpnDteWA5UTUQs= |
| In-reply-to: | <20110613141324.GC32466@dastard> |
| References: | <BANLkTinCvmt+=ZO9HwUWda1vkmLEqOfSwg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110613141324.GC32466@dastard> |
Hello, I better to send the xfstest log as attachment becuase of it large size On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 02:16:02PM +0530, Ajeet Yadav wrote: >> Dear All. >> I have installed the 2.6.35.13 long term valilla kernel release >> (www.kenrel.org) on my Intel core 2 duo PC, and run 11-05-2011 xfstest >> version, and run on it, below is the list of fails test cases. >> As far as I know community uses xfstest for QA, seeing so many fails, >> I am bit worried. > > It shouldn't fail very many tests at all... > >> Can anyone hepl me know that why so many fails, is I missed some >> config option ? or these test cases are not applicable ? or there is >> someting else > > Well, without telling us why the tests are failing (i.e. copy all > the output rather than just telling us some tests failed) we have no > idea what the failures you are seeing are. Without some indication > of what they failures are nobody can really comment on your > situation.... > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Your friend Randolf has recommended this great product from CGpart, Randolf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [nxgaxk] 吃冰啦!每年夏天非來幾塊不可!!iig67vtya4qta31o6q56e, halenlukekavi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfstest run result on 2.6.35.13 X86, 51 test cases failed, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfstest run result on 2.6.35.13 X86, 51 test cases failed, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |