xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

xfstest run result on 2.6.35.13 X86, 51 test cases failed

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: xfstest run result on 2.6.35.13 X86, 51 test cases failed
From: Ajeet Yadav <ajeet.yadav.77@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:16:02 +0530
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HMPV95wsb/0f45/22ttPoNE4HF6kYoMqEO9tBGRe2FY=; b=nT/ogCWQXhaMec5PU7xKdXKTot51gyaB0dVlTPhJCK4i5BOKiRGyjIIBgRTpz31nIj 5PReEg8nkGdtqbo7t8JTnoGhQTRpOacJGPujACySm9/Re2+Zzh/EL54ixhVhKd7fWBla 0dfBJvb3RwBclkjXXZciDsO0KXu/TUTOJyOyw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ok6/EgMfhRGh4DXV0eVfxmk1wM4ZYD9BLpWLatGHGoqp/FcSCpToiMVTokYnm4DCtm aEK3KiAiqQO1l1Z7O2hQehmPIt6cBtBeXssuiDyU3R7FEcsbij+prpaD578RyGcYaLVY 5uRczqUMVXUsdHLAmnYBF2bIDKCEf1X5mx7bg=
Dear All.
I have installed the 2.6.35.13 long term valilla kernel release
(www.kenrel.org) on my Intel core 2 duo PC, and run 11-05-2011 xfstest
version, and run on it, below is the list of fails test cases.
As far as I know community uses xfstest for QA, seeing so many fails,
I am bit worried.
Can anyone hepl me know that why so many fails, is I missed some
config option ? or these test cases are not applicable ? or there is
someting else
12
13
18
30
31
49
73
74
76
78
79
80
82
84
104
109
111
112
113
129
133
136
167
170
171
172
173
174
178
180
181
189
195
198
200
202
207
208
210
211
216
224
229
239
240
241
242
247
250
251
252

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>