| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs? |
| From: | Norbert Veber <nveber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:54:57 -0400 |
| Cc: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110609211731.GT32466@dastard> |
| References: | <20110607163742.GH28625@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201106080911.11286@xxxxxx> <20110608122638.GQ28625@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110609012907.GR32466@dastard> <20110609134811.GI28625@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110609211731.GT32466@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:17:31AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > The mount options are only there to cahnge the alignment that > already exists, and there are significant limitations on those > changes. Oh I see. I will reformat and set sunit/swidth for my current 3 disk raid5 (2 data disks). What if I later add a 4th disk (3 data disks), would using the mount option to specify the new swidth have any performance hit? I assume old files might work slower but any new data that is written would be aligned across all the drives? Or should I just reformat again at that point? Thanks, Norbert |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs?, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re.funds, Jean-Marie Degryse |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs?, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, master, updated. v2.6.38-18957-g59c5f46, xfs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |