| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs? |
| From: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:11:10 +0200 |
| Cc: | Norbert Veber <nveber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20110607163742.GH28625@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | it-management http://it-management.at |
| References: | <20110607163742.GH28625@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38.6-zmi; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) |
On Dienstag, 7. Juni 2011 Norbert Veber wrote: > 20 seconds vs 3+ minutes?! The only difference I can see is > lazy-count=1 and a larger agcount. Sunit and swidth were also set > automatically by mkfs this time. Then retry mounting the old fs with sunit= and swidth= parameters. Are they on the same disks? What are your disks (number, kind)? -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services: Protéger http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531 // Haus zu verkaufen: http://zmi.at/langegg/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: I/O hang, possibly XFS, possibly general, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: I/O hang, possibly XFS, possibly general, Michael Monnerie |
| Previous by Thread: | Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs?, Norbert Veber |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs?, Norbert Veber |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |