| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect |
| From: | Dave Howorth <dhoworth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:00:10 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <20110607133429.GA9049@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | MRC Centre for Protein Engineering |
| References: | <4DEE0EA4.9090002@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110607115441.GA4653@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DEE2078.3010102@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110607133429.GA9049@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20060911) |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Linux 2.6.32 isn't really something supported by us. It's not just a > very old codebase, but also one where a lot of the XFS code was pretty > much in flux. If you want supported old releases work use one of > the commercially supported one like RedHat or SuSE. 2.6.32 is also the kernel in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs?, Norbert Veber |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |