xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect

To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:34:29 -0400
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4DEE2078.3010102@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4DEE0EA4.9090002@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110607115441.GA4653@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DEE2078.3010102@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:58:32PM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> Sorry i can't. I'm not a kernel hacker. But i think a real bug /
> showstopper should be fixed in a longterm stable kernel.

Linux 2.6.32 isn't really something supported by us.  It's not just a
very old codebase, but also one where a lot of the XFS code was pretty
much in flux.  If you want supported old releases work use one of
the commercially supported one like RedHat or SuSE.

> Redhat seems to have fixed it on it's own:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642680

I suspect the upstream commit you want is
081003fff467ea0e727f66d5d435b4f473a789b3, but I can't gurantee this
actually applies to the 2.6.32 codebase.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>