| To: | Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:34:29 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4DEE2078.3010102@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4DEE0EA4.9090002@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110607115441.GA4653@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DEE2078.3010102@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:58:32PM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > Sorry i can't. I'm not a kernel hacker. But i think a real bug / > showstopper should be fixed in a longterm stable kernel. Linux 2.6.32 isn't really something supported by us. It's not just a very old codebase, but also one where a lot of the XFS code was pretty much in flux. If you want supported old releases work use one of the commercially supported one like RedHat or SuSE. > Redhat seems to have fixed it on it's own: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642680 I suspect the upstream commit you want is 081003fff467ea0e727f66d5d435b4f473a789b3, but I can't gurantee this actually applies to the 2.6.32 codebase. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |