[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add support for ext4dev FSTYP

To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add support for ext4dev FSTYP
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:22:22 -0500
Cc: XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Sergey Ivanov <sergey57@xxxxxxxxx>, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <BANLkTikfjitncM=zLpfTrfQkd8VfQAxbUA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <BANLkTimBnAgiXZnvS56eAzEdJ=kw1zVGsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DE5C1FE.8080006@xxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTikfjitncM=zLpfTrfQkd8VfQAxbUA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv: Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
On 5/31/11 11:56 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 5/31/11 10:13 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>>> From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> blkid knows to identify the ext4dev FSTYP of a partition that was
>>> formatted with mkfs.ext4dev.
>>> quota tools and various util-linux utils are also aware of ext4dev,
>>> so ext4dev shares the same capabilities as ext4.
>>> While testing on Fedora 15, we encoutered a buggy fsck utility, which
>>> invokes fsck.ext4, even though it was called with -t ext4dev argument.
>>> In our setup fsck.ext4dev knows about new fs features that fsck.ext4
>>> doesn't know, so the generic_fs_check fails.
>>> Since we have no real use of the extra capabilities provided by fsck util,
>>> we decided to invoke fsck.$FSTYP directly to avoid this issue.
>> Adding ext4dev to every case seems harmless enough.  TBH I thought I had
>> it there already but I guess not.
>> I'm less certain of the change from fsck -t $FSTYP to fsck.$FSTYP
>> What issue are you avoiding?  wouldn't fsck -t ext4dev invoke fsck.ext4dev 
>> anyway?
>> It seems like it should be harmless, but I don't understand how it helps you.
> As I wrote in the patch description, the fsck utility in Fedora 15 invokes
> fsck.ext4 for some reason when calling fsck -t ext4dev.

Oh, right.

> this fails because fsck.ext4 doesn't know the snapshot feature.
> I didn't debug fsck utility for that. it seemed pointless.

Did you file a bug with Fedora?  I'd rather fix the root cause than work around 
Feel free to cc: me on the bug.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>