| To: | Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Failure of xfstest 229 |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 May 2011 12:58:40 +1000 |
| Cc: | XFS Mailing List <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1305852937.7661.369.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1305852937.7661.369.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 05:55:37PM -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > Hi all, > > I remember running this test successfully sometime back. No. it's never passed. It's a placeholder to remind us how to reproduce a known problem that is difficult to fix. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: drastic changes to allocsize semantics in or around 2.6.38?, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | I thought you would enjoy this page on villasitalia.com!, niceprofit |
| Previous by Thread: | Failure of xfstest 229, Chandra Seetharaman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Failure of xfstest 229, Chandra Seetharaman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |