[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks

To: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:36:15 +1000
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1105031740460.18728@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1104291250480.18728@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110429201701.GA13166@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.01.1104291710340.18728@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110501080149.GD13542@dastard> <alpine.DEB.2.01.1105012135260.18728@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110502121958.GA2978@dastard> <alpine.DEB.2.01.1105021247410.18728@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110503005114.GE2978@dastard> <alpine.DEB.2.01.1105031345090.18728@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.01.1105031740460.18728@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 05:46:14PM -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> And another one, please see the files marked with 15- here:
>    https://trent.utfs.org/p/bits/2.6.39-rc4/oom/trace/
> I tried to have more concise timestamps in each of these files, hope that 
> helps. Sadly though, trace-cmd reports still segfaults on the tracefile.

Ok, that will be helpful. Also helpful is that I've (FINALLY!)
reproduced this myself, and i think i can now reproduce it at will
on a highmem i686 machine. I'll look into it more later tonight....


Dave Chinner

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>