Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill off xfs_printk()

[Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 15:14 -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> xfs_alert_tag() can be defined using xfs_alert(), and thereby avoid
> using xfs_printk() altogether.  This is the only remaining use of
> xfs_printk(), so changing it this way means xfs_printk() can simply
> be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can
> simply be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can simply be
> eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can
> simply be eliminated.

Recursion overflow?