xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill off xfs_printk()

To: <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill off xfs_printk()
From: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 15:21:22 -0500
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <a7077b2b2f6f46ac48d03cff4ccede2feba18f07.1304453673.git.aelder@xxxxxxx>
References: <a7077b2b2f6f46ac48d03cff4ccede2feba18f07.1304453673.git.aelder@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: <aelder@xxxxxxx>
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 15:14 -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
...
> xfs_alert_tag() can be defined using xfs_alert(), and thereby avoid
> using xfs_printk() altogether.  This is the only remaining use of
> xfs_printk(), so changing it this way means xfs_printk() can simply
> be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can
> simply be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can simply be
> eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can
> simply be eliminated.

. . .


In case it wasn't clear from my text, xfs_printk() can
simply be eliminated.

(I don't know how all those duplicates got in there.)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>