| To: | Paul Anderson <pha@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS/Linux Sanity check |
| From: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 02 May 2011 10:09:59 -0700 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <BANLkTik4YjSr7-VA+f9Sh+UxvKfFKMy=+w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Paul Anderson's message of "Mon, 2 May 2011 11:47:48 -0400") |
| References: | <BANLkTik4YjSr7-VA+f9Sh+UxvKfFKMy=+w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Paul Anderson <pha@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > md apparently does not support barriers, so we are badly exposed in MD barriers for RAID-0 were added in 2.6.33, but very recent kernels have much improved barriers again. > Secondly, I welcome suggestions about which version of the linux > kernel you'd prefer to hear bug reports about, as well as what kinds Kernel developers usually want reports about the newest versions, ideally with enough information to debug the problem (that is backtraces etc.) When you have a hang but the console is still active you can also just dump the threads with sysrq-t Often when things hang it's the underlying IO subsystem (driver, IO device). -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs hang on 2.6.39-rc5, Bruno PrÃmont |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS/Linux Sanity check, Emmanuel Florac |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS/Linux Sanity check, Paul Anderson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS/Linux Sanity check, Emmanuel Florac |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |