| Subject: | Re: fs corruption |
|---|---|
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:37:18 +0200 |
| Cc: | Leo Davis <leo1783@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110412110532.GB31057@dastard> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <31377534.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110412094917.GY31057@dastard> <38287.10078.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110412110532.GB31057@dastard> |
Le Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:05:32 +1000
Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait:
> it's possible that it took a couple of months to trip over a random
> metadata corruption. I've seen that before in directory trees and
> inode clusters where corruption is not detected until next time they
> are read from disk....
>
That's why background scrubbing of RAID arrays is generally a good
habit to contract :)
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: HUGE XFS regression in 2.6.32 upto 2.6.38, Raz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] xfs: fix duplicate message output, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: fs corruption, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: fs corruption, Leo Davis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |