[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfsprogs

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfsprogs
From: Leo Davis <leo1783@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1302600398; bh=i+VtrzdwuJiBtWVjTM8ogdfDoK8Wl2tTzUApoL1g8AI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ktQevoZOmO8SR5Qcf6dlvCr04s3Lt+lbXMQfMXo7VdvHR2wmIr9WnOoSjw6+usAJhg3I4zWbnt7wxTE2aygS8SZqRp7ZgfpibtCgxHqz9DdiC/W/Yelcjr5yxjWdiq1L8HLbcU6EmNeCRkP/GPyQ2s1Q0VPbgyMnCByKX0FvqE4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lipANa+T6765xbAfBauUHcZ8Rf5hqxMaUA/ig5F1Svn+jRPTZxY5oskO2V6GgMRgQdo3FZ20kjG9V+1U0RyiY5uiBnNok/Rf1jj+Ax+cEAc9tb3QIqGi5PYh6XACD93oKdE+O6JBpZBzXI12oHaUiTRlEQLlcmat+gSchR+55A0=;
In-reply-to: <4D9DF2CB.1020503@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <31342497.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D9DF2CB.1020503@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you very much :)

From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: stress_buster <leo1783@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, April 7, 2011 10:52:19 PM
Subject: Re: xfsprogs

On 4/7/11 9:04 AM, stress_buster wrote:
> Hi,
> My xfs_repair is bit old- 2.9. version.
> I'm considering installing latest available. But just worried because this
> is my production server and has some custom apps built into my OS.
> Is upgrading xfs_repair a high risk?


> Also do I need to install latest xfsprogs or anyway only to upgrade
> xfs_repair from the package?
> I'm only would need xfs_repair mostly, so doesnt matter to me leaving
> others-mkfs.xfs etc in xfsprogs at the old version if that minimises the
> risk...

if you really want to try newer xfs_repair only, just build an xfsprogs tree and run from inside the tree.

> Any thoughts?

Just upgrade.  ;)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>