| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/9] xfs: introduce background inode reclaim work |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:06:33 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110406181426.GB4356@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1302070758-17312-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1302070758-17312-5-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110406181426.GB4356@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 02:14:26PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > + * We can have inodes enter reclaim after we've shut down the syncd
> > workqueue
> > + * during unmount, so don't allow reclaim work to be queued during unmount.
>
> Nipick: this part of the comment would be better just above the
> MS_ACTIVE check. I just tried to figure out what it was for, and it
> took me a while to realize the explanation was in the block comment
> above the function.
Will fix.
> > +static void
> > +xfs_syncd_queue_reclaim(
> > + struct xfs_mount *mp)
> > +{
> > + if (!(mp->m_super->s_flags & MS_ACTIVE))
> > + return;
>
> Otherwise looks good.
I'll assume you meant to add a Reviewed-by tag there and include it
in the next posting.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/9] xfs: fix extent format buffer allocation size, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: convert the xfsaild threads to a workqueue, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/9] xfs: introduce background inode reclaim work, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 6/9] xfs: clean up code layout in xfs_trans_ail.c, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |