xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfstests: failure to umount ext4

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfstests: failure to umount ext4
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:01:01 +0200
Cc: XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=W2UtgubePfIxQwVbcYflLMc48uCN7NSUBHhbKVwqGdA=; b=MCVWwvB5CQnZVXYdQULw+G+ovMtgOcJ+J1F1r3Dqe2tV03MSjqnbR2eHYc5ebzzYg+ o+pM/mOOqVRZCmGiGaitG2XeA//SpN0fBF0GaTeSWIbuZmDPQzG7KQW2BFpXw1rkSvN4 /mAh7LLY0PN4Pb6ob/HMgZYMr2EDdXZVOpvGA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dN+4BgEE42YRy5mH+61WWsQP3RFb2YMWFJq725wvQ7/lyVWOt4YOn7pQrXHN7QgdTu AU52GO/ruV+e0BIxJlL4dGRoK1hht9k2QaINNIAwiw+6Ay1IF+yXcebVldNX4m5IeqvG QB/o1ob1l1JFIeO+iEbUXRR3Be8jLRoNCII1o=
In-reply-to: <4D8A1594.5060505@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <AANLkTi=NKxmvJx_oEpdeMtfU9ePv4ofG5PjCuh23RJ+A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D8A0A70.9030201@xxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=JvL6LoL=VOrHoiQKheqzDrVwOQtWAkumzaBk5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D8A1594.5060505@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 3/23/11 10:33 AM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 3/23/11 9:36 AM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been running xfstests on ext4 and I always get annoying failures to 
>>>>> umount:
>>>>>
>>>>> 213 8s ... 31s
>>>>> umount: /mnt/test/ext4: device is busy.
>>>>>        (In some cases useful info about processes that use
>>>>>         the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1))
>>>>>
>>>>> post 198 mostly fails to umount as well.
>>>>> and post 124 always fails to umount.

USE_REMOUNT=1 fixes (bypasses) the problem for non scratch tests, so
I'm good with it for now :-)

Amir.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>