xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.38.1: CPU#0 stuck for 67s! / xfs_ail_splice

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.38.1: CPU#0 stuck for 67s! / xfs_ail_splice
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 04:10:11 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20110327232543.GU26611@dastard>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1103260927500.21571@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110327232543.GU26611@dastard>
User-agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)


On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Dave Chinner wrote:

On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 09:29:36AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Hi,

When I rm -rf a directory of a few hundred thousand
files/directories on XFS under 2.6.38.1, I see the following, is
this normal?

No. What is you filesystem config (xfs_info) and your mount options?
Is it repeatable? I? the system otherwise stalled or is it still
operating normally? Does it recover and work normally after such a
stall?

Hi Dave, default mkfs.xfs options:

What is you filesystem config (xfs_info) and your mount options?

# xfs_info /dev/sda1
meta-data=/dev/sda1              isize=256    agcount=44, agsize=268435455 blks
         =                       sectsz=512   attr=2
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=11718704640, imaxpct=5
         =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=521728, version=2
         =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

/dev/sda1 on /r1 type xfs 
(rw,noatime,nobarrier,logbufs=8,logbsize=262144,delaylog,inode64)

Is it repeatable?
I've not tried to repeat it as is spews messages over all of my consoles but
it has happened more than once.

the system otherwise stalled or is it still operating normally?
The console/xterm/ssh etc that is performing the removal does lockup but
you are able to access the machine via a separate ssh connection.

Does it recover and work normally after such a stall?
Yes, eventually, I believe I started seeing this problem when I added
'delaylog' option to the mount options..

Justin.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>