| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] xfs: make discard operations asynchronous |
| From: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:04:55 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110322200138.216042448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20110322195550.260682574@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110322200138.216042448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | aelder@xxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 15:55 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Instead of waiting for each discard request keep the CIL context alive > until all of them are done, at which point we can tear it down completly > and remove the busy extents from the rbtree. > > At this point I'm doing the I/O completion from IRQ context for simplicity, > but I'll benchmark it against a version that uses a workqueue. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> This looks good. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> . . . |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 5/6] xfs: add online discard support, Alex Elder |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/6] xfs: preallocation transactions do not need to be synchronous, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] xfs: make discard operations asynchronous, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 1/6] xfs: optimize AGFL refills, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |